The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter XI, from Pope Simplicius to Acacius

Synopsis: Simplicius informs Acacius that the Catholic bishop Timothy of Alexandria has formally retracted his earlier lapse in reciting the name of the condemned Dioscorus at the altars and has sought forgiveness from Rome, and urges Acacius to press the emperor to exile Peter Mongus and to strengthen the Churches by imperial decree.

Simplicius, bishop, to Acacius, bishop of Constantinople.

Simplicius Commends Acacius’s Constancy and Rejoices That the Alexandrian Church Has Been Restored

How great and how abundant are the fruits that the constancy of faith and the strength of minds devoted to the Catholic religion always bear — the labor of Your Charity and of those who together with you have long been troubled by the devil shows. For when the enemy of Christ and of the Christian kingdom — soon to fall — invaded its court and shook the faithful and the Lord’s people with impious persecution, by prayer and vigils overcame the sacrilegious attempts; and the victory of heavenly grace extended so far that, with the return of the most religious prince, a Catholic bishop was also restored to the Church of Alexandria — over which, together with the exultation of divine grace, We brought together Our joys and caused ourselves to congratulate each other with mutual letters.

Timothy Has Retracted His Diptychs Lapse and Sought Forgiveness From Rome

And although the fullness of his own joy was never wanting, nevertheless Our brother and fellow bishop Timothy — made more proven by persecution, not unmindful of his former conduct — sent solemn letters through Our brother and fellow bishop Isaiah, and Our sons Nilus the presbyter and Martyrius the deacon of the Church of Alexandria. In these he reported that he had undone what he had previously done under fear regarding the name of Dioscorus, and sought the remission of that error; and he has made Us rejoice in the peace of the Church — having experienced toward himself, as Your Charity sees together with Us, that what We then reproved in him was not left unavenged; and now, reconciled to himself, he [experiences] the affection of divine mercy, dearest brother.

Simplicius Urges Acacius to Press Zeno to Exile Peter Mongus and to Strengthen the Churches

With the aforementioned [envoys] established in the city where they had recently arrived, and seizing the occasion of Our son Peter, the distinguished count, departing as if by design, We have wished to bring this same news to your attention — both by Our own intention and by the petition of Our brother and fellow bishop Timothy and his legates — so that you too may share in the common joys, and may gather with Us the fruit of your labor in the tranquility of the aforementioned Church, as We have said. And presenting Our letters to the most Christian and most clement prince — so that he too may rejoice in the gifts of his own devotion and faith under God’s protection — with Your Charity’s persistent zeal, may he deem it worthy to strengthen the Churches of the Catholic religion by sending salutary writings with more vigorous effort: lest — as We have experienced — that ancient serpent, its head so often crushed, pour out its venom in any region, and — God forbid — find again an occasion to infect some.

Let him arrange by the provident ordering of his piety’s commands, and let him establish by laws — as he has more evidently commended himself to God — that the religious be protected: that [the heretics] neither lurk in darkness, nor strike unawares those walking in the light, nor — as the prophet testifies — lie in wait to seize those whom they find poor in faith (cf. Ps. 10:9). Above all, let Peter — who is sheltered in the hiding places of certain houses and of others like himself, and whom the zeal of faith caused to be removed from the episcopate — be cast out to distant lands. As We have written to his piety, let the emperor decree by special command, for the sake of ecclesiastical peace, that Peter — who is said to be ceaselessly plotting against the disposition of the faith — be removed.

Simplicius Accepts the Petition of Satisfaction From the Lapsed and Asks Acacius to Report Back

Since We have had to indicate and specially admonish these things through the occasion of a most faithful messenger, We urge that when the messenger begins his return, or if any other occasion should arise, you make Us informed as soon as possible and hasten to relieve Our concern. Moreover, so that We might rejoice with perfect joy, Our brother and fellow bishop Timothy sent to Us a copy of the petition of satisfaction from those whom the condemned Timothy and Peter had led astray through fear of condemnation, seeking forgiveness. Desiring with priestly piety to come to the aid of the fallen, We do not consider this to be refused — in view of divine mercy, which wills that none should perish.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter XI is the direct sequel to Letter IX, and the relationship between the two letters makes both more significant than either would be alone. In Letter IX (March 13, 478), Simplicius congratulated Acacius on the restoration of Timothy Salofaciolus to Alexandria but raised the concern that Timothy had earlier lacked episcopal constancy when the name of the condemned Dioscorus was extorted from him for commemoration at the altars. In Letter XI — written later in 478, with the envoys Isaiah, Nilus, and Martyrius having arrived at Rome — Simplicius reports the resolution: Timothy has formally retracted the diptychs lapse, sought and received forgiveness from Rome, and forwarded a petition of satisfaction from the Alexandrian faithful who had been led astray by Timothy Aelurus and Peter Mongus.

The diptychs sequence across Letters IX and XI deserves the reader’s close attention because it establishes the pattern that would govern the entire Acacian Schism. The pattern is: Rome identifies a liturgical-canonical compromise as a failure of episcopal constancy (Letter IX); the offending bishop corrects the lapse and seeks Roman forgiveness (Letter XI); Rome accepts the correction and pronounces the petition of the lapsed to be receivable (Letter XI). The same pattern — in reverse — is what would produce the schism: Rome would identify Acacius’s communion with Peter Mongus as a failure of Catholic constancy, demand correction, receive no correction, and excommunicate. And the same pattern — completed — is what would end the schism: the Formula of Hormisdas (519) would require the Eastern bishops to remove the condemned names from the diptychs (the same act Timothy performed in response to Letter IX) and to seek restored communion with Rome (the same act Timothy performed through his solemn letters). Letter XI is the successful template for what Hormisdas would accomplish on a universal scale forty-one years later.

The letter also advances the Peter Mongus subplot. In Acacius’s letter, Peter had been driven into “eternal flight.” In Letter IX, Simplicius had already been recalling the diptychs concern as a sign that the settlement was fragile. In Letter X, Simplicius revealed that Peter was still lurking in Alexandria and asked Zeno to exile him. Now in Letter XI, Simplicius presses the same request through Acacius: Peter is sheltered in hiding places, is ceaselessly plotting, and must be cast out to distant lands by special imperial command. The repetition of the exile request — first directly to the emperor in Letter X, now through Acacius in Letter XI — shows that Zeno had not yet acted on the first request. The reader should note that this is the pattern that would characterize the final years of the Simplicius pontificate: Rome asking, Constantinople intermediating, the emperor delaying, and Peter Mongus remaining in place.

The structural role assigned to Acacius in this letter is the same as in Letter IX. Simplicius writes to Acacius; Acacius is to present the letters to the emperor; the emperor is to issue “salutary writings” to strengthen the Churches. Constantinople is the necessary intermediary between Rome and the imperial court, and Acacius is expected to exercise “persistent zeal” in pressing the emperor to act. The reader should note that this is not a request between equals; it is a delegation. Simplicius is directing the course of action and asking Acacius to execute it locally. The vocabulary of delegation — insistente caritate tua, “with Your Charity’s persistent zeal” — is the same vocabulary Leo used when delegating tasks to his vicars and representatives.

The acceptance of the libellus satisfactionis at the close is the final jurisdictional act of the letter. Lapsed Alexandrians have petitioned their local bishop for readmission to Catholic communion; Timothy has forwarded their petition to Rome; and Simplicius has accepted it. The acceptance is grounded not in Timothy’s local judgment but in Simplicius’s own assessment — refutabile non putamus, “We do not consider this to be refused” — exercised “in view of divine mercy, which wills that none should perish.” The Roman bishop is the one who pronounces the petition receivable; the local bishop is the one who forwarded it. This is appellate jurisdiction in its pastoral form: not a contested case requiring adjudication, but a petition requiring authorization, and the authorization comes from Rome.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy