The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter XVI, from Pope Leo to the Bishops Throughout Sicily

Synopsis: Leo writes to all the bishops of Sicily to correct the practice of administering baptism on the Epiphany rather than at Pascha and Pentecost alone — grounding his correction in the obligation he bears as the occupant of Peter’s see, whose own profession of love for the Lord would be found lacking in Leo if he were negligent — arguing through a theological account of the mysteries of Christ’s life that baptism belongs to the Paschal mystery and not to the Epiphany; requiring that three Sicilian bishops attend the annual Roman synod; and commanding that the institutes of the Apostolic See be reverently observed throughout Sicily.

Leo, bishop, to all the bishops established throughout Sicily, greetings in the Lord.

Divine precepts and apostolic admonitions urge Us to watch over the state of all the Churches with tireless zeal, and where anything merits reproof, to apply the necessary correction and instruct you with the clearest truth. For since the command of the Lord’s voice remains — by which the most blessed Apostle Peter was imbued with the mystic sanction, repeated three times, to feed Christ’s sheep if he loves Him — We are constrained by reverence for that very See which We preside over by the abundance of divine grace to avoid the peril of negligence as far as We can: lest the profession of the chief Apostle himself, by which he declared his love for the Lord, be found wanting in Us — since one who negligently feeds the flock so often entrusted to him is shown not to love the supreme Shepherd (Feed my sheep, John 21:17).

Chapter I: Baptism Is Not to Be Administered on the Epiphany; The Apostolic See Is the Teacher of Ecclesiastical Reason and the Source of Priestly Dignity

Through the concern of fraternal affection, I have learned with some anxiety that in what is the chief among the sacraments of the Church, you are departing from the custom of apostolic institution — administering the sacrament of baptism more numerously on the day of Epiphany than at the Paschal season. I marvel that you, or your predecessors, could have adopted so irrational a novelty, believing there to be no difference between the day on which Christ was adored by the Magi and the day on which He rose from the dead — as if the mysteries of both were interchangeable.

You could never have fallen into this fault if, from where you received the consecration of your honor, you had also taken the law of all your observance: namely, the See of the blessed Apostle Peter, which is without doubt both the teacher of ecclesiastical reason and the source of your priestly dignity. Your departure from its rules would have been less tolerable had Our admonition come before it. Now, hoping for correction, We exercise gentleness. Though priests can hardly be excused by the claim of ignorance, We temper the necessary censure and instruct you with the truth.

Chapter II: All the Sacraments of Salvation Are Ordered by Their Own Times Through the Dispensations of Christ’s Incarnation

The restoration of mankind was eternally preordained in the counsel of God — but the temporal order of that restoration began with the Incarnation of the Word. One time marks the angel’s announcement to the blessed Virgin Mary, who conceived by the Holy Spirit (Luke 1:26); another marks the birth of the child, with the virginity of His mother intact, announced to the shepherds by the voice of a heavenly host (Luke 2:7–14); another His circumcision on the eighth day (Luke 2:21); another the legal offering made for Him; another when the three Magi, led by a new star from the East, adored Him in Bethlehem (Matt. 2:11). Different again are the days of His flight into Egypt to escape Herod’s malice (Matt. 2:15), and of His return to Galilee after the persecutor’s death (Matt. 2:20). Through all these dispensations the Lord grew in age and grace (Luke 2:52); He went up to Jerusalem at Pascha with His parents (Luke 2:41); He was found debating with the elders in the Temple and said: Did you not know that I must be in my Father’s house? (Luke 2:49). When, in mature years, He submitted to John’s baptism, the Spirit descended on Him in the form of a dove and the Father’s voice declared: You are my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased (Matt. 3:17; Luke 3:22).

We briefly review these things to show that Christ’s days are all consecrated by His works and virtues, with sacramental mysteries shining in His every action. Yet each is distinctly signified or fulfilled, and they do not all pertain equally to the proper time of baptism. If the miracles performed after His baptism were to be honored without distinction, every day would be a feast, since all days are full of wonders. But the Spirit of wisdom and understanding ensured that the apostles and teachers of the Church would maintain proper order — so that we, as one flock and one shepherd, might speak the same things and hold the same mind, as the Apostle teaches: Be united in the same mind and the same judgment (1 Cor. 1:10).

Chapter III: Baptism Signifies Death to Sin; Trinal Immersion Imitates the Three-Day Burial

Though the humility and glory of Christ converge in one person, and His divine power working through human weakness brings about the whole of our restoration, it is baptism’s gift uniquely that creates a new creature from the old — through the death of His crucifixion and the life of His resurrection. The Apostle says: Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? We were buried therefore with Him by baptism into death (Rom. 6:3–5). In baptism, death to sin takes place; the trinal immersion imitates the three-day burial; and the rising from the water mirrors the resurrection from the tomb.

The very nature of the act teaches us that the legitimate day for this universal grace is the day on which its virtue and its form first came to be. After the Resurrection, Christ gave to His disciples — and through them to all the teachers of the Church — the form and power of baptizing: Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19). He could have given this commission before His passion; but He chose to bind the grace of regeneration to His resurrection. Pentecost, sanctified by the coming of the Holy Spirit, is joined to Pascha as an extension of the same mystery — offering to those who were prevented by infirmity, distance, or the dangers of sea travel the fulfilment of their desire through the gift of the Spirit.

Chapter IV: Peter Baptized by Apostolic Example on Pentecost

We defend this not from Our own persuasion but from apostolic authority, following the blessed Apostle Peter himself — who, on the day the promised Holy Spirit came upon the assembled believers, baptized three thousand of those converted by his preaching. Scripture attests: They were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles: What shall we do? Peter said to them: Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins (Acts 2:37–41).

Chapter V: Only Pascha and Pentecost Are the Times Set for Baptism by the Roman Pontiffs

Since these two times are clearly and unmistakably legitimate for the baptism of the Church’s elect, We admonish your beloved to mix no other days with this observance. Though other feasts merit fitting reverence, We must guard the mystical and rational exception for this chief sacrament — while not withholding its grace from any who need it in mortal danger.

Chapter VI: Those Under Necessity May Be Baptized at Any Time

While We reserve the freely made vows of the safe and peaceful for these two joined feasts, We decree that this singular aid of salvation be denied to no one who faces mortal danger — whether from siege, persecution, or shipwreck — at whatever time they present themselves.

Chapter VII: Three Sicilian Bishops Are to Attend the Annual Roman Synod; The Institutes of the Apostolic See Must Be Observed

We also require, for the sake of preserving the closest unity, that — just as the holy Fathers wholesome ordained that two episcopal councils be held each year — three of you unfailingly attend the fraternal synod at Rome on the third day before the Kalends of October. For with God’s grace it will more easily be provided that no scandals arise and no errors take root in the churches of Christ, when all is continually treated in common before the most blessed Apostle Peter, so that all his constitutions and the decrees of the canons may remain inviolate among all the Lord’s priests.

We trust that these instructions, delivered with the Lord’s inspiration, will reach you through Our brothers and fellow bishops Bacilius and Paschasinus, whose report will show Us how reverently the institutes of the Apostolic See are being kept among you.

Given on the twelfth day before the Kalends of November, in the consulship of Calepius and Ardabur, most illustrious men.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter XVI is addressed to all the bishops of Sicily (the island being at this time securely within the Western Empire and the direct ecclesiastical orbit of Rome) and concerns a liturgical irregularity: the Sicilian churches had been administering baptism primarily on the feast of Epiphany rather than at Pascha and Pentecost, which Leo regards as the only proper times for the initiation of the elect. The bulk of the letter — Chapters II through V — is a sustained theological argument for why baptism belongs specifically to the Paschal mystery and not to the Epiphany. But the letter’s frame, which opens and closes with explicit primacy claims, is what makes it significant for the question of papal authority.

The opening paragraph contains one of Leo’s most striking statements of what his presidency of Peter’s see entails. He is constrained — the word is coartamur, “we are hemmed in,” “forced” — by reverence for the see he occupies to avoid negligence: not because the Pope has a general obligation to be a good pastor, but because Peter’s own profession of love for the Lord would be found wanting in Leo if Leo were negligent. The succession is not merely administrative; it is personal. Leo presides over Peter’s see, and therefore Peter’s commitment — “I love you, Lord” — is what Leo is accountable to fulfil. This is one of the most compressed and theologically dense expressions of the Petrine succession doctrine in the entire Leo corpus, and the reader will note that it is stated not in a doctrinal letter against heresy but in a routine disciplinary letter about baptismal timing. The primacy doctrine is not reserved for special occasions; it is the standing ground of every intervention Leo makes.

Chapter I adds a further dimension with the claim that the Apostolic See is not only the teacher of ecclesiastical reason for the Sicilian bishops but the source of their priestly dignity — they received their episcopal consecration ultimately from Peter’s see, and they should accordingly draw their rule of practice from the same source. The argument structurally parallels Letter IX’s account of why Alexandria must follow Roman practice: as the Alexandrian church received its apostolicity from Mark, who received from Peter, so the Sicilian churches received their priestly standing from Peter’s see and owe it their observance in return. The claim is not made aggressively but stated as a logical inference: if you draw your dignity from here, you should draw your rule from here too.

The closing chapter requires the three Sicilian representatives to attend the annual Roman synod — held each year on October 28 — and frames the purpose of that gathering as meeting “before the most blessed Apostle Peter,” so that all his constitutions and the canonical decrees may remain inviolate. The annual synod is the institutional mechanism by which the relationship of ongoing oversight is maintained: once a year, Sicilian bishops come to Rome, are present before Peter, and confirm their unity with the Apostolic See’s practice. The closing commission to Bacilius and Paschasinus — that their report will show Leo how reverently the Apostolic See’s institutes are being kept — identifies the reporting relationship as the normal mode of accountability between the Sicilian churches and Rome.

One figure in the letter deserves special notice: Paschasinus of Lilybaeum (modern Marsala, western Sicily), who is named alongside Bacilius as the letter’s bearer. Paschasinus had written to Leo years earlier about the paschal calculation (Letter III), and Leo now entrusts him with this correction to the Sicilian bishops. He would go on to serve as Leo’s personal legate at the Council of Chalcedon in 451, where he presided in Leo’s name and delivered the opening declaration of the council. The same bishop who carried a pastoral correction to Sicily in 447 would represent Peter’s see before the assembled bishops of the entire Christian world four years later.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy