The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter CXII, from Pope Leo to Empress Pulcheria

Synopsis: Leo writes to Pulcheria on the same day as Letter CXI to Marcian, lamenting Anatolius’s appointment of the Eutychian Andrew as archdeacon over the orthodox Aetius, demanding that Pulcheria use her authority to recall Anatolius to his profession of faith, and commending Julian of Cos — to whom Leo has delegated his own role — as one whose counsel is to be heard as Leo’s own solicitude for the universal Church.

Leo, bishop, to Pulcheria Augusta.

Chapter I: Leo Laments Anatolius’s Appointment of Andrew Over Aetius

With the many proofs by which your piety’s love for God’s Church has been made manifest, your aid is rightly sought whenever scandals arise — so that the faith, defended by your efforts against the inventions of heretics, may hold the lasting strength of secure peace. What does it profit to suppress the enemies of truth abroad if they revive within the Lord’s sheepfold? I am greatly anxious — and reasonably fear regret for having trusted, at your urging, that the bishop of Constantinople, ordained by opponents of the faith, held better intentions, supported by the testimony of your piety, so that the weakness of his ordination might not burden him where your intervention had aided. I had begun to rejoice that he honored blessed Flavian’s memory and opposed the efforts of heretics. Yet I grieve — as Aetius’s tearful complaint makes evident — that he has turned for the worse, appointing as archdeacon the one he had publicly professed to reject: the one who revealed himself to us as a defender of Eutyches’s heresy. By placing him over ecclesiastical affairs, he demonstrates his favor toward this heretical perversity — and even if Andrew could merit indulgence by great satisfaction, he ought not to have been preferred over those who stand firm in the faith.

Chapter II: Leo Directs Pulcheria to Recall Anatolius to His Profession, and Commends Julian as His Delegated Solicitude

Since your clemency knows how much danger is nourished by shameful sloth or deceitful wickedness, deign to recall the bishop to the profession of his faith with your authority. Let him not heap further stains upon himself nor scorn the reputation he gained by your favor. Let him sever all connection with the heretic he once removed, and cease persecuting the one he ought to have held all the dearer. I rejoice that your piety has aided Aetius’s innocence with worthy consolation.

As for my brother Julian, your venerator — judge by the estimation of the Apostolic See how greatly your favor toward him ought to grow. Trusting in the sincerity of his faith, in the cause of the faith which your glory serves, I delegated to him My role — so that he might not depart from your reverence nor cease presenting my piety to you, fulfilling my solicitude in guarding the faith and ecclesiastical discipline, and suggesting what is profitable to the universal Church. In him, neither your aid to the Catholics we wish to support, nor my service to you, fails.

Dated the sixth day before the Ides of March, in the consulship of Opilio, most illustrious man.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter CXII is the companion letter to CXI — written on the same day, to the other imperial figure, about the same situation. Where CXI addressed Marcian as the active imperial authority with coercive power, CXII addresses Pulcheria as the figure whose personal influence over Anatolius had been the original basis for Leo’s acceptance of his episcopate. Leo had trusted Anatolius partly because Pulcheria had vouched for him; Pulcheria therefore has both the obligation and the standing to recall Anatolius to the profession he had made under her testimony.

The letter is short, but its two structural moves are worth noting. The first is the administrative directive: Leo specifies who is to be restored, who is to be expelled, and what Anatolius must do to remain in the Apostolic See’s good standing — directed this time at an empress rather than an emperor, but with equal directness. The point made in Letter CXI’s Commentary applies here as well: these are internal personnel decisions about Constantinople’s own church, issued by Leo as conditions, not offered as advice. The reader who holds CXI and CXII alongside Letter CXXXII — where Anatolius reports compliance — has before them a complete administrative sequence: directive, imperial transmission, obedient execution, and report back to Rome.

The second structural move is the recommissioning of Julian. The sollicitudo formula — Leo’s defining term for the Roman bishop’s universal pastoral responsibility — is here explicitly delegated to Julian in its fullness: Julian is to fulfill “my solicitude in guarding the faith and ecclesiastical discipline, and suggesting what is profitable to the universal Church.” This is not merely a request that Pulcheria receive Julian’s counsel; it is an identification of Julian’s counsel with Leo’s own solicitude. What Julian recommends carries Leo’s authority because it is Leo’s pastoral responsibility in delegated form. Pulcheria is being asked to receive it accordingly — measured by the Apostolic See’s estimation of Julian’s worth, not by any local calculus.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy