The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter LXXI, from Pope Leo to the Archimandrites of Constantinople

Synopsis: Leo writes to the archimandrites of Constantinople to complain that although the most clement emperor has sent letters showing his solicitude for the universal Church’s peace, the Constantinopolitan bishop and those who consecrated him have indicated nothing to Leo about suppressing or renouncing errors — as if no scandal had existed in that Church, or as if the ordained man’s merit need not chiefly be shown by demonstrating himself free from notions adverse to Catholic teaching — and to inform them that he has dispatched his brothers and fellow bishops Abundius and Asterius with the presbyters Basilius and Senator to the most pious prince with sufficient instruction of the paternal authorities, urging the archimandrites to aid the legates in all things so that the impiety that has rushed blindly into ruin may no longer deceive the simple.

Leo, bishop, to Faustus, Martinus, Petrus, Manueli, Job, Antiochus, Abrahamius, Theodorus, Pientius, Eusebius, Helpidius, Paulus, Asterius, and Charosus, presbyters and archimandrites, and Jacobus, deacon and archimandrite.

Leo Complains of Anatolius’s Silence on Renouncing Errors; Legates Dispatched; The Archimandrites Called to Collaborate

The cause of the faith — on which Christian salvation rests — compels me to labor with much solicitude, fearing that the wickedness that should have been cut off at its roots may, with time’s passage, become more stubborn and widespread.

For although the most clement emperor sent us letters showing his solicitude for the peace of the universal Church, the Constantinopolitan bishop himself, and those who consecrated him, have indicated nothing to us about suppressing or renouncing errors — beyond what pertained to the new bishop’s ordination: as if no scandal, no offense had existed in that Church, or as if the ordained man’s merit need not chiefly be demonstrated by showing himself free from the notions adverse to Catholic teaching.

Lest the examination of truth be drawn out into excessive delays — as tends to happen across distant regions — We have sent our brothers and fellow bishops Abundius and Asterius, and the most proven presbyters Basilius and Senator, to the most pious prince with sufficient instruction of the paternal authorities.

We desire your diligence and solicitude to aid them in all things, most beloved brothers, so that the impiety which with blind audacity has rushed into ruinous precipices may no longer have the power to deceive the simple — since we also desire, through corrective remedies, to aid those who erred through ignorance or were led astray by fear. Therefore you, who are justified by faith — because you cherish Catholic truth and have been taught by the Holy Spirit concerning the singular mystery of human salvation — collaborate with us, and strive with all possible devotion so that, with falsehood destroyed and the solidity of the faith defended, we may securely enjoy the peace of God throughout the whole world.

Given on the sixteenth day before the Kalends of August, in the seventh consulship of Valentinian Augustus and in the consulship of Avienus, most illustrious men.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter LXXI is the third and final letter in Leo’s post-Latrocinium correspondence with the Constantinople archimandrites — the sequence that began with Letter XXXII (June 449, before Ephesus II), continued through Letter LI (October 449, after the disaster), and now closes with this July 450 dispatch. Together the three letters form a pastoral arc across the entire crisis: XXXII sent the archimandrites to the Tome before the storm; LI rallied them to Flavian’s cause in the immediate aftermath; LXXI mobilizes them in support of Leo’s legates as the campaign for resolution enters its final phase.

The expanded address list is significant. Where Letters XXXII, LI, and LXI had been addressed to Faustus and Martinus alone, LXXI names fourteen archimandrites — presbyters and a deacon — by name. Leo has been systematically broadening his Constantinople monastic network throughout the post-Latrocinium period, and by July 450 he is addressing nearly the full leadership of the monastic community as a collegial body. The depth of this network matters: when Theodosius died and the political situation shifted, it was the Constantinople monastics who provided the popular ecclesiastical base that Pulcheria and Marcian could draw on to reverse the Ephesine settlement. Leo had been cultivating that base for a year.

The complaint about Anatolius’s silence is pointed. Anatolius had written to Leo presenting himself (Letter LIII) but had sent no doctrinal declaration concerning the Eutychian controversy. Leo tells the archimandrites that this silence is not neutral — it is an omission of something that was owed. The new bishop of Constantinople was obligated to demonstrate his freedom from the error his own sponsors had championed at Ephesus II, and he had not done so. Leo is informing the monastic community of this default precisely because they are the constituency with both the standing and the practical influence to press Anatolius from within Constantinople. The legates will work from outside; the archimandrites are to work from inside. The strategy is the same coordinated pressure Leo has been applying across every available channel since August 449 — except that now, with Theodosius’s death eleven days away, the obstruction was about to lift.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy