The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter LXXX, from Pope Leo to Bishop Anatolius of Constantinople

Synopsis: Leo writes to Anatolius of Constantinople to rejoice in the Lord and glory in His grace, which has shown Anatolius a follower of evangelical teaching — approving the acts he received duly fortified with necessary subscriptions — and to address four matters: the reconciliation of bishops who repented of their yielding at Ephesus, to be arranged through the shared solicitude of Leo’s legates and Anatolius, with prior anathema of what was received against the Catholic faith; the prohibition against reciting the names of Dioscorus, Juvenal, and Eustathius at the sacred altar, since those who persecuted innocent and Catholic bishops must not be mixed without distinction among the saints; the commendation of Julian of Cos and the Flavian-loyal clerics to Anatolius’s care; and the announcement that Eusebius is in Rome and in Leo’s communion, with his church to be defended by Anatolius’s solicitude until he arrives.

Leo, bishop, to Anatolius, bishop.

Chapter I: Leo Rejoices in Anatolius’s Proven Faith; The Acts Are Approved; Leo’s Emissaries Returned After Easter

We rejoice in the Lord and glory in the gift of His grace — which, as we learned from the letters of your charity and from the report of our brothers whom we sent to Constantinople, has shown you a follower of evangelical teaching. Through the worthy faith of a bishop, we rightly presume that the Church entrusted to you will bear neither wrinkle nor stain of error, as the Apostle says: For I have betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a chaste virgin to Christ (2 Cor. 11:2). For she is indeed that virgin, the Church, the bride of the one husband Christ, who allows no error to corrupt her: so that throughout the whole world there may be for us the one integrity of a single chaste communion, in whose fellowship we embrace your charity — and We approve the acts we received, duly fortified with the necessary subscriptions.

Therefore, to strengthen your charity’s spirit by our words in return, we sent back our sons Casterius the presbyter, and Patricius and Asclepiades the deacons — who had brought your writings to us — with our letters after the venerable Paschal feast, declaring, as stated, our joy in the peace of the Constantinopolitan Church, for whose care we always labor so that it may never be violated by the deceit of heretics.

Chapter II: The Reconciliation of Repentant Bishops; The Integrity of Priesthood Depends on the True Incarnation

Regarding our brothers — whom your letters and our legates’ report show to desire our communion, grieving that they did not maintain constancy against power and terrors, but yielded to another’s crime when fear drove them to serve tremblingly in the condemnation of a Catholic and innocent bishop and the acceptance of detestable depravity — we approve what our present and acting legates established: that they be content with the communion of their own churches for the time being. Yet we desire it be arranged through the shared solicitude of our legates and of you, so that those who condemn with full satisfaction what was badly done, and choose to accuse themselves rather than defend themselves, may rejoice in the unity of our peace and communion — provided they first anathematize what was received against the Catholic faith.

For in the Church of God, which is the body of Christ, neither episcopal offices are valid nor sacrifices true unless the true High Priest reconciles us in the property of our nature, unless the true blood of the spotless Lamb cleanses us. For though He is seated at the Father’s right hand, He fulfills the mystery of propitiation in the same flesh taken from the Virgin, as the Apostle says: Christ Jesus, who died — yes, who also rose — who is at the right hand of God, who intercedes for us (Rom. 8:34). Our kindness cannot be faulted for receiving those we grieved had been deceived when they satisfy us. Nor therefore is our communion’s grace to be denied harshly, nor to be granted rashly — for as it is full of piety to restore the Lord’s charity to the oppressed, so it is just to impute all disturbance to its authors.

Chapter III: The Names of Dioscorus, Juvenal, and Eustathius Must Not Be Recited at the Altar

Regarding the names of Dioscorus, Juvenal, and Eustathius being recited at the sacred altar — let your charity observe what our legates there judged must be done, which does not oppose the honorable memory of Saint Flavian and does not estrange Christian souls from your grace. For it is altogether too unjust and unfitting that those who tormented innocent and Catholic bishops by their persecution be mixed without distinction among the names of the saints — since, not abandoning the condemned impiety, they condemn themselves by their own depravity, and must either be struck for perfidy or labor for pardon.

Chapter IV: Julian of Cos and Flavian’s Loyal Clerics Commended; Eusebius in Leo’s Communion; The Apostolic See’s Peace Confirmed With Anatolius

We desire our brother and fellow bishop Julian and the clerics who faithfully adhered to Flavian of holy memory to adhere to your charity — so that he whom we know lives before our God through the merits of his faith may recognize himself present in you. We also wish your charity to know that our brother and fellow bishop Eusebius — who for the cause of the faith endured many trials and labors — now dwells with us and persists in our communion: whose Church we desire your solicitude to defend, so that nothing may perish in his absence and no one presume to prejudice him in any matter, until he arrives with the prosecution of our letters. And so that greater affection toward you from us and from all the Christian people may be stirred, we desire what we wrote to your charity to become known to all — so that those who serve our God may rejoice in the confirmed peace of the Apostolic See established with you. Your charity will be more fully instructed on other matters and persons by the letters you receive through our legates.

Given on the Ides of April, in the consulship of Adelfius, most illustrious man.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter LXXX is Leo’s first direct letter to Anatolius of Constantinople — the bishop whose election he had withheld recognition from in Letters LXIX and LXX, pending a profession of faith and subscription to the Tome. The letter’s very existence confirms that the conditions have been met. Leo writes to Anatolius as a brother bishop in communion, approves his acts, and addresses him as a pastoral collaborator rather than a suspect. The journey from Letter LIII (Anatolius presenting himself to Leo, October 449) through the suspended recognition of Letters LXIX–LXX (July 450) to this letter (April 451) is the complete arc of how Leo exercised confirmatory jurisdiction over the most important episcopal appointment in the Eastern church.

The approbation in Chapter I — “We approve the acts we received, duly fortified with the necessary subscriptions” — is worth pausing over. Leo is formally approving the record of proceedings brought to him by Anatolius’s emissaries. This is not a casual acknowledgment; it is a judicial act. The legitimacy of what Anatolius has done derives from Leo’s approbation. The same confirmatory jurisdiction that Leo had exercised over the Gallic bishops in Letters X and LXVI is here being applied to the bishop of Constantinople — and after a sustained period of suspension during which Leo had refused to extend it.

The reader should step back and observe what Leo is doing across all four chapters of this letter. He is directing the internal affairs of the Church of Constantinople with the same authority he exercises over Gaul and Illyricum. Chapter I approves Anatolius’s acts — confirmatory jurisdiction. Chapter II specifies the conditions on which the repentant Eastern bishops may be reconciled: it is Leo who determines the terms, Leo who specifies the required anathema, Leo who authorizes his legates and Anatolius to work together as joint agents — with Leo setting the framework within which that joint work operates. Chapter III prohibits specific names from the Constantinopolitan diptychs — directing the liturgical practice of the most powerful Eastern church. Chapter IV orders the protection of Eusebius’s church and Julian’s position and instructs Anatolius on how those cases are to be handled. None of this is advisory. These are directives issued to the bishop of Constantinople about the internal ordering of his own church. If Rome and Constantinople were co-equal patriarchs with Rome holding merely a precedence of honor, Leo would have no standing to direct any of this. The fact that this letter exists — that Leo writes to Anatolius in this register, on these matters, in this tone — is itself evidence of the governing relationship that exists between the two sees.

The prohibition of Chapter III — against reciting the names of Dioscorus, Juvenal, and Eustathius at the altar — is Leo directing the liturgical practice of the Constantinopolitan church. The diptychs were not administrative lists; they were liturgical acts of commemoration declaring communion with the named parties. To exclude these names was to declare that their acts at Ephesus II were not the acts of saints but of men who had condemned themselves. Leo is exercising his pastoral jurisdiction over the Constantinople church’s diptychs from Rome, through his legates, specifying who may and may not be liturgically honored there.

The letter’s closing — “those who serve our God may rejoice in the confirmed peace of the Apostolic See established with you” — frames the entire relationship in its proper ecclesiological terms. The reconciliation between Leo and Anatolius is not a bilateral agreement between two equal sees that have resolved a disagreement; it is the confirmation of the Apostolic See’s peace as the governing standard of Catholic unity in Constantinople. The peace that the Constantinople faithful are invited to celebrate is the peace of the Apostolic See — and it has been established on Leo’s terms, after Anatolius satisfied Leo’s conditions.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy