Leo, bishop, to Martinus and Faustus, presbyters and archimandrites.
Chapter I: Leo Informs Martinus and Faustus of the Letters Sent to Them
That God is the author of good works and spiritual zeal — rousing minds and aiding actions — is beyond doubt. This has appeared clearly to us in present experience. For amidst the vast distances between regions, our hearts took one counsel: so that what you desired from us reached you at the very time your letters were being sent, if indeed our writings were able to be delivered to your beloved. These were directed not only with the authority of the Apostolic See, but also with the unanimous consent of the holy synod that frequently convenes with us,1 so that the care of the minds of all the faithful, and the support of the most clement princes, might be sought for the defense of the faith. We do not doubt that their pious and Catholic spirits will furnish help and authority to just petitions — so that, with the Lord’s help, the pernicious heresy long condemned by the authority of the holy Fathers, and lately ill-supported at Ephesus, may be swiftly removed.
Chapter II: Leo Urges Them to Spread the True Doctrine and Pledges to Spend Himself for the Universal Church
Meanwhile, let your beloved strive, as far as possible, to make known to all the sons of the Church who we preach against the impious teaching, according to the evangelical and apostolic doctrine. For although we have written the full Catholic belief that always has been and is, we have now added no small exhortation to confirm all minds.
For I am mindful that I preside over the Church under the name of him whose confession was glorified by our Lord Jesus Christ — whose faith destroys all heresies and especially vanquishes the impiety of the present error. And I understand that I am permitted nothing other than to expend all my efforts in that cause in which the salvation of the universal Church is under attack.2
Lest our writings should have failed to reach you through some occasion of negligence, we have judged it necessary to send copies now — so that the preaching of the faith we defend may in no way be withheld from your knowledge.
Given on the sixteenth day before the Kalends of April, in the seventh consulship of Valentinian Augustus and in the consulship of Avienus, most illustrious men.3
Footnotes
- ↩ The relationship between the Apostolic See’s authority and the synodal consensus that accompanies it is stated here with precision: the letters carry both, but the Apostolic See’s authority is named first and independently. The synod convenes with Leo — around him, as the center — and its unanimous consent reinforces but does not constitute the letters’ authority. This pattern is consistent with the joint-format letters of October 449 (Letters XLIV, XLV, L, LI), where Leo and the Roman Synod appear together as signatories. The Apostolic See is the governing institution; the synod is its gathered expression.
- ↩ Memor enim sum me sub illius nomine Ecclesiae praesidere, cujus a Domino Jesu Christo est glorificata confessio — “I am mindful that I preside over the Church under the name of him whose confession was glorified by our Lord Jesus Christ.” This is the Petrine succession stated with exceptional directness. Leo does not say he governs in his own name, or in Christ’s name alone, or by conciliar grant. He governs under Peter’s name — the name whose confession Christ glorified at Caesarea Philippi (Matt. 16:17-18). The office is Peter’s; Leo holds it. What follows is the inexorable consequence: because the office is Peter’s, Leo is permitted nothing other than to spend himself entirely for the cause where the universal Church’s salvation is at stake. Universal responsibility flows from universal office. This sentence is among the clearest expressions in the entire corpus of what Leo understands the Petrine succession to mean in practice.
- ↩ April 16, 450 — the same date as Letter LX to Pulcheria. Both letters were dispatched together as part of the same spring 450 effort to maintain Leo’s eastern network. Martinus and Faustus had been addressed previously in Letters XXXII (June 449) and LI (October 449). This third letter to them completes a sustained pastoral relationship across the full arc of the Latrocinium crisis, from Leo’s pre-council doctrinal preparation to his post-council campaign for vindication.
Historical Commentary