The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter II, from Pope Gelasius to Laurentius, Bishop of Lignido

Synopsis: Gelasius writes to Laurentius of Lignido, having assumed the pontificate, prescribing according to the custom of the Roman Church the formula of faith which all are bound to profess, setting forth the Christological definition against all who would confuse, divide, or diminish the two natures of Christ, and expressing hope that the emperor will support this preaching in the Illyrian regions.

Gelasius to Laurentius, Bishop of Lignido.

The Custom of the Roman Church: A Newly Established Pope Prescribes the Formula of Faith to All the Holy Churches

In the length of your charity’s letter you have filled us with great joy — in that part where it was said that in the Church of Thessalonica, and likewise in the other churches where the letter of our predecessor concerning the offenses of Acacius was read, all pronounced anathema against him, and no one mingled himself with the communion of the transgressor. Since, therefore, you admonish us with fraternal charity to administer, as it were, a certain medicine of faith to the bishops throughout Illyricum and to others — although this was done most copiously by our predecessor of blessed memory — and since it is the custom of the Roman Church that a newly established priest prescribe the formula of his faith to the holy Churches, we have sought to renew these same things in the most compendious brevity, so that the reader may recognize in this letter of Ours, for the sake of brevity, under what faith he must live, according to the statutes of the Fathers.

The Christological Formula: Two Natures, One Person, Without Confusion or Conversion

We confess, therefore, our Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God — born before all ages, without beginning, from the Father according to His divinity; and in the last days incarnate from the most holy Virgin Mary, and made perfect man by the assumption of a rational soul and body — homoousios with the Father according to His divinity, and homoousios with us according to His humanity. For the unity of the two perfect natures was accomplished ineffably, on account of which we confess one and the same Christ, the same Son, only-begotten of the Father and firstborn from the dead — knowing that He is indeed coeternal with His Father according to His divinity, according to which He is the maker of all things, and that after the consent of the most holy Virgin He deigned, when she said to the angel: Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it done unto me according to your word (Luke 1:38), to build ineffably from her a temple for Himself, and to unite it to Himself.

He did not bring down from heaven a body coeternal with Himself from His own substance, but received one from the mass of our substance — that is, from the Virgin — and united it to Himself. It is not that God the Word was turned into flesh, nor that He appeared as a phantom, but that He inconvertibly and immutably preserved His own essence, taking up the first-fruits of our nature and uniting them to Himself. For in the beginning God the Word deigned in His great goodness to unite to Himself these first-fruits of our nature — not mingled, but in each substance one and the same, as it is written: Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up (John 2:19). For Christ Jesus is dissolved according to the mere substance which He assumed, and He alone raises up His own temple — He Himself according to His divine substance, according to which He is also the maker of all things.

Never, moreover, after the Resurrection did He depart from the union with our nature, from His own temple, nor can He depart, on account of His ineffable goodness; but He is Himself the Lord Jesus Christ, both passible and impassible — passible according to His humanity, impassible according to His divinity. He raised up, therefore, His own temple — God the Word — and in Himself He accomplished the resurrection and renewal of our nature. And this our Lord Christ God, after He rose from the dead, showed to His disciples, saying: Handle me, and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones, as you see me to have (Luke 24:39). He did not say “as you say I am” but “as you see me to have” — so that, considering both the one who has and the one who is had, you should recognize not confusion, not conversion, not mutation, but the unity that was made. Therefore He showed the marks of the nails and the wound of the lance, and ate with His disciples, so that through all things He might teach that the nature which was ours has been renewed in Himself.

And because according to the blessed substance of His divinity He is inconvertible, immutable, impassible, immortal, needing nothing, accomplishing all passions — He permitted Himself to be brought to His own temple, which He raised by His own power, and through the perfection of His own temple accomplished the renewal of our nature. But those who say that Christ was a subtle man, or that God was passible, or that He was turned into flesh, or that He did not possess a real body, or that He brought this body down from heaven, or — saying that God the Word was mortal — that He was unworthy to be raised by the Father, or that He assumed a body without a soul, or a man without understanding, or two substances of Christ confused according to a mingling into one substance, and who do not confess that our Lord Jesus Christ possesses two natures without confusion and one person — all of these the Catholic and apostolic Church anathematizes.

Closing: The Antidote Sent; Hope for the Emperor’s Support

These, then, are the things, most beloved brother, which as an antidote you have demanded that we send. Do not shrink from anything in them as bitter, nor look upon anything sweet in them as harmful. For we had arranged to send some persons from our assembly, if circumstances had permitted — which we believe we shall do at the opportune time, when the correction of those regions has been reported to us, with the Lord’s help, by a fuller delegation, as we trust will happen. We hope also in the mercy of our God that the most clement and most Christian emperor will join his unanimity and assistance to this preaching of Ours — so that by the faith in which he excels he may restrain those in those regions from their petty disputes and their arguments according to the elements of this world, as the vessel of election foretold, who are unwilling to be contained by wholesome disciplines: but as the same Apostle says, you have not so learned Christ (Col. 2:20; Eph. 4:20), if indeed you have heard Him and have been taught in Him, as the truth is in Jesus — which he will surely be able to apprehend who has observed the institutions of the orthodox Fathers, as has so often been said.

May God keep you safe, dearest brother.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter II is Gelasius’s encyclical profession of faith, sent upon his accession to the pontificate through the Illyrian vicariate to the Macedonian and Dardanian bishops. Its primary significance lies not in its Christological content — which is a standard Chalcedonian formula — but in the institutional claim embedded in its framing. Gelasius states plainly that it is the custom of the Roman Church that a newly established pope prescribe the formula of his faith to all the holy Churches. The Latin is precise: mos est Romanae Ecclesiae noviter constituto sacerdoti formam fidei suae ad sanctas Ecclesias praerogare. The verb is praerogare — to prescribe, to deliver authoritatively. The Churches do not confirm the pope’s faith; the pope prescribes it to them.

The reader should note the continuity claim that frames the entire letter. Gelasius does not present himself as inaugurating a new policy toward Illyricum. He states that his predecessor Felix III already did this “most copiously” — copiosissime factum sit de beatae recordationis praedecessore nostro — and that he is now renewing the same instruction. This is the same pattern visible in Leo’s Illyrian correspondence (Letters V and VI), where Leo renewed the vicariate arrangements established by Damasus and formalized by Siricius. The Roman See’s relationship with Illyricum was not improvised pope by pope; it was a standing institutional arrangement, renewed and exercised by each successive occupant of Peter’s see. Gelasius is doing what Leo did, what Felix did, and what their predecessors did before them.

The Christological formula itself is notable for its systematic precision. It moves through the key Chalcedonian affirmations — two natures, one person, without confusion or conversion — and then appends a catalogue of errors, each anathematized by the Catholic and apostolic Church. The formula functions as a test: anyone who receives it and professes it is in communion; anyone who rejects any part of it is not. This is not a theologian’s treatise offered for discussion; it is a papal prescription of the faith that must be held.

The closing reference to the emperor is significant. Gelasius expresses hope that the “most clement and most Christian emperor” — Anastasius I, who had succeeded Zeno in 491 — will support his preaching. At this early stage of Gelasius’s pontificate, the relationship with Anastasius had not yet deteriorated to the point it would reach by the time of the Duo Sunt letter (Letter VIII). The hope expressed here is diplomatic but not submissive: Gelasius hopes the emperor will join his unanimity to “this preaching of Ours.” The preaching is Gelasius’s; the emperor’s role is to support it. Even in a courteous register, the direction of authority is clear.

The Dardanian bishops’ Rescript — their reply to this letter — confirms that the letter achieved its purpose. The bishops received Gelasius’s prescriptions through Trypho, pronounced anathema on the heretics named, and asked the Apostolic See to send a representative to oversee the implementation of its instructions in their region. The exchange is a compact illustration of how papal authority operated in the Illyrian vicariate: the pope prescribes; the bishops receive and obey; when they need further direction, they ask Rome to send someone.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy