The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter CXLIX, from Pope Leo to Basil, Bishop of Antioch

Synopsis: After noting that he was not duly informed of Basil’s ordination through proper ecclesiastical custom, Leo admonishes him — as he has admonished certain other brothers by letter — to resist with holy steadfastness the Eutychian fury which, having murdered Proterius at Alexandria, was demanding a new council to overturn Chalcedon; he praises the emperor’s rejection of this demand and instructs Basil to ensure that this exhortation reaches all the bishops of his region.

Leo to Basil, bishop of Antioch.

Chapter I: Leo Admonishes Basil Concerning the Alexandrian Crisis, and Urges Steadfast Resistance to the Eutychians

We should indeed have learned of your charity’s ordination in the proper ecclesiastical manner, whether through your own account or that of our provincial brothers the bishops. But since there was no lack of causes which could have impeded this diligence, and the prince of holy memory, Marcian, made your consecration known to us through his own writings, so that we need have no just cause to doubt one whom we know — we admonish your charity, as we have admonished certain of our other brothers by our letters, in view of the present necessity. For having learned of those things which have been committed at Alexandria by the fury of the Eutychians — which I do not doubt have become fully known to your brotherhood — by virtue of the duty of solicitude which I owe to all the Churches of God, I have directed these writings, by which I believed your charity ought to be admonished, that you may resist their wicked attempts with holy steadfastness, lest in any of ours the common faith be found either anxious or lukewarm. With the Lord’s favor, who does not desert His Church in any tribulation, we have in the most devout emperor so religious and so Catholic a spirit that nothing different is to be believed of him than what we proved of Marcian of august memory.

Chapter II: Leo Praises the Emperor’s Rejection of Heretical Demands, and Instructs Basil to Circulate This Exhortation to All Bishops

For even while our own action was still pending, the most faithful emperor was so horrified by the parricidal crime that he granted no access to the action of the heretics, who — after the enormity of the deed they had perpetrated — believed it possible that, with the definitions of the holy Chalcedonian synod dissolved, an episcopal council might be summoned for other proceedings. Because this, dearest brother, is manifestly and abruptly hostile to the Christian faith, and is demanded with such wickedness for no other reason than that the preaching of the Gospel and the mystery of the Lord’s Incarnation might be subverted, I beseech your charity that you relax your minds in nothing from the definitions of the Council of Chalcedon, and suffer not those things which were composed by divine inspiration to be violated by any novelty. For I am certain that the most merciful emperor and the magnificent Patricius, together with all the assembly of the illustrious powers, will permit the heretics to gain nothing for the disturbance of the Church, if they shall see that pastoral minds waver in nothing. But in order that this exhortation may reach the notice of all our brothers and fellow bishops, let your charity’s diligence take care — for, as must often be said, the whole Christian religion is thrown into confusion if anything from what was decreed at Chalcedon should be overturned.

Given on the Kalends of September, in the consulship of Constantinus and Rufus.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter CXLIX is dated September 1, 457 — the same day as Letter CXLVIII to Emperor Leo I — and belongs to the second wave of Leo’s coordinated response to the Alexandrian crisis. The first wave, dispatched on July 11, comprised three simultaneous letters: CXLV to the emperor, CXLVI to Anatolius of Constantinople, and CXLVII to Leo’s apocrisiarii Julian and Aetius. The September 1 letters — CXLVIII to the emperor and CXLIX to Basil of Antioch — constitute a follow-up campaign, reinforcing the July directives after Leo has received Anatolius’s report of the emperor’s favorable dispositions. Leo mentions in Chapter I that he has already admonished “certain of our other brothers by letters” — indicating that CXLIX is itself one arm of a still broader simultaneous exhortation reaching multiple eastern bishops, of which not all letters survive.

The opening of the letter is quietly but precisely pointed. Leo notes that he ought to have learned of Basil’s ordination to the patriarchal see of Antioch through proper ecclesiastical channels — either Basil’s own report or the account of the neighboring bishops. Antioch was one of the five patriarchal sees recognized at Chalcedon, and the expectation Leo states applies to it without qualification: even a patriarch was to inform Rome of his consecration through proper channels. That the notification came instead through Emperor Marcian’s own writings is presented without formal rebuke, but the expectation is stated plainly and the proper channel named. The notification custom is not a courtesy owed by lesser bishops to a senior one — it is the mechanism by which communion with the Apostolic See is established and confirmed, and it runs from every episcopal see, however ancient and honored, to Rome.

The theological premise of the entire letter is stated in a single phrase in Chapter I: Leo writes to Basil — a Patriarch — pro ea sollicitudine quam omnibus Ecclesiis Dei debeo — “by virtue of the solicitude which I owe to all the Churches of God.” The word debeo is the weight-bearing term. Leo does not describe his universal pastoral responsibility as something he generously extends; he describes it as a debt his office owes. This is the sollicitudo formula that recurs across the entire Leo corpus — in the Illyrian letters (V, VI), in the Gallic letters (X), and now in the eastern crisis of 457 — always with the same structural implication: the ordinary and immediate jurisdiction of the Roman pontiff extends to every church, and its exercise in any given case is not an intervention but a discharge of obligation. When Leo writes to the Patriarch of Antioch about events in Alexandria, he is not exceeding his remit; he is fulfilling it.

The closing instruction of Chapter II displays the Roman pontiff’s jurisdiction operating through the patriarchal structure rather than around it. Leo does not dispatch separate letters to every eastern bishop; he directs the Patriarch of Antioch to ensure that his exhortation reaches all of them. The role Basil plays here is the same role Anatolius of Constantinople played in the July 11 cluster: both patriarchs are activated by Leo’s letters, directed toward Leo’s objectives, and functioning as channels through which Roman authority reaches the broader Church. The direction runs consistently from Rome outward — through whichever patriarchal instrument is most suited to the purpose — and not from the patriarchs as independent authorities managing their own spheres.

Leo’s confidence in the emperor’s reliability — “nothing different is to be believed of him than what we proved of Marcian of august memory” — reflects a consistent principle in his engagement with imperial authority: the emperor’s role is to enforce what the Church’s legitimate authority has defined. The bishops’ steadfastness is the condition Leo names as sufficient to secure this outcome: “if they shall see that pastoral minds waver in nothing.” The division of roles is precise — the bishops hold the definition; the emperor restrains those who resist it. Neither role substitutes for the other, and the definition precedes and governs the enforcement.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy