The Early Church and Peter's Primacy

Letter CXLIII, from Pope Leo to Anatolius, Bishop of Constantinople

Synopsis: Leo exhorts Anatolius to report more frequently on what is being done in Constantinople, since knowing this pertains to the benefit of the whole Church; directs him to press earnestly against the remnants of wicked men who have settled there — suppressing and abolishing them — lest through any laziness of mildness those that were destroyed too slowly revive.

Leo, bishop, to Anatolius, Bishop of Constantinople.

Let Not the Remnants of Heretics Lurking in the City Be Nourished by Excessive Mildness and Revive

I gladly receive the offices of charity from your dilection — and I exhort you to exercise them more frequently: since it pertains to the benefit of the whole Church when We know what is being done.

In what solicitude your charity ought to be vigilant you understand without doubt — since you yourself recognize that some remnants of wicked men have settled among you: to suppress these, or rather — with the Lord’s help — to abolish them entirely, We desire you to press earnestly, lest — which God forbid — through any laziness of mildness, those that have been too slowly destroyed might revive.

Dated the third day before the Ides of March, in the consulship of the Augustus Valentinianus for the eighth time.

Source/Reference

Notes / Historical Commentary

Letter CXLIII is one of the shortest letters in the corpus but carries considerable weight for the primacy question. It is written to Anatolius — the patriarch with whom Leo had restored communion in May 454 — and it is a directive, not a fraternal exhortation. The distinction matters: Leo does not ask Anatolius to consider whether the heretical remnants require attention; he directs him to press earnestly against them and warns against the laziness of excessive mildness. The claim that justifies the directive — knowing Constantinople’s situation pertains to the benefit of the whole Church — places the Apostolic See’s solicitude as the ground of Leo’s expectation of information and action. What happens in Constantinople is not Anatolius’s private pastoral business; it belongs to the whole Church’s benefit and therefore to Leo’s knowledge and direction.

The letter is also evidence that the restoration of communion in Letter CXXXV did not end Leo’s active oversight of Constantinople’s internal affairs. The conditions of CXXVIII were satisfied, the breach of CXXXII was closed, and now Leo continues precisely as he had before the Anatolius confrontation began: directing the patriarch’s internal pastoral governance, receiving reports, and issuing expectations of continued action. The restoration of communion restores the relationship; it does not alter its structure.

The Early Church and Peter's Primacy