Leo to Bishop Flavian of Constantinople.
Encouragement After the Legates’ Departure; The Letters Already Sent as Doctrinal Standard; Mercy for Those Who Repent
After our representatives, sent to you for the cause of the faith, had already departed, we received the writings of your beloved through our son the deacon Basilius1 — who rightly provided us with what was needed concerning the matter of our shared solicitude,2 since the acts previously sent had already informed us fully of all things, and Basilius, returning our God’s words, was apt for familiar inquiry. We exhort your beloved, in whom we trust, using apostolic words: In nothing be terrified by your adversaries, which is to them a cause of destruction, but to you of salvation (Phil. 1:28).
What is more destructive than, by denying the truth of Christ’s Incarnation, seeking to dissolve all hope of human salvation — and openly contradicting the Apostle who says: Great is the mystery of godliness, which was manifested in the flesh (1 Tim. 3:16)? What is more glorious than fighting for the faith of the Gospel against the enemies of Christ’s birth and cross?
In the letters already sent to your beloved, we have made clear what is in our heart concerning this most pure light and unconquered virtue3 — so that nothing may seem ambiguous between us regarding what we have received and teach according to Catholic doctrine. Since the testimonies of truth are so clear and strong, whoever does not instantly shake off the darkness of falsehood at the brilliance of its light must be reckoned utterly blind and obstinate.
Yet, to heal the madness of the ignorant, we desire you to apply patience’s remedy — that through fatherly rebukes, those childish in mind despite their body’s old age may learn to obey their elders. If they lay aside their ignorance’s vanity, condemning all error and embracing the true and singular faith, let the mercy of episcopal benevolence not be denied them. The judgment already pronounced stands if the impiety justly condemned persists in its perversity.
Given on the tenth day before the Kalends of August, in the consulship of Asturius and Protogenes, most illustrious men.4
Footnotes
- ↩ The deacon Basilius (not to be confused with other bearers of that name in the corpus) is the carrier who brought Flavian’s letter to Leo after the main legates had already left Rome. His arrival is significant for the chronology of this period: the PL Admonitio before Letter XXXIV discusses at length whether he is the same Basilius who delivered Julian of Cos’s letter, and whether this affects the dating of Letter XXXV. The present letter confirms he is distinct from the legates; he served as a separate channel between Flavian and Rome.
- ↩ The phrase de negotio communis sollicitudinis — “concerning the matter of our shared solicitude” — uses the sollicitudo formula in its collaborative form. Leo and Flavian share the burden of the faith’s defense; but the structure of the letter makes clear that Leo is the senior partner who sends encouragement, sets the doctrinal standard, and directs the terms of the pastoral response. The “common” solicitude does not imply parity; it describes the shared responsibility that flows from Rome’s universal sollicitudo to its ally in Constantinople.
- ↩ “The letters already sent to your beloved” — this is Leo’s reference to the Tome (Letter XXVIII), already dispatched with the legates. “We have made clear what is in our heart” (quid in secreto esset corde patefacimus) — Leo describes the Tome as an intimate disclosure of his settled doctrinal conviction. The Tome is not a diplomatic or administrative document but the expression of what Leo holds as the truth. Making clear to Flavian that nothing between them is ambiguous is part of the pastoral function of Letter XXXVIII: Flavian needs to know that Rome’s position is certain, even as he faces the approaching council.
- ↩ July 23, 449 — “the tenth day before the Kalends of August.” This places Letter XXXVIII nine days before the opening of Ephesus II (August 1). Leo is still writing encouragement; the disaster has not yet occurred. The letter is the last confident communication to Flavian before the Latrocinium. After August 1, when Dioscorus presided over proceedings that would humiliate Leo’s legates and depose Flavian, the tone of Leo’s Eastern correspondence changes entirely.
Historical Commentary